(855) 909-3021
Call Us Now
Email Us Now
Violence at apartment complexes across the Atlanta metro area, including communities in Duluth and the greater Savannah region near Pooler, is more common than many residents expect. A shooting in a parking lot, an assault near a stairwell, or an attack in an unlit corridor can leave tenants with life-altering injuries. What many victims do not realize is that the landlord may share legal responsibility for what happened.
Georgia law recognizes a duty that property owners owe to the people who live on and visit their property. When a landlord ignores known dangers, skips basic security measures, or fails to act after prior incidents, a negligent security claim may be available to the person who was harmed.
What Is Negligent Security Under Georgia Law?
Negligent security is a premises liability theory holding property owners responsible when inadequate safety measures allow foreseeable criminal acts to harm tenants or visitors.
Under O.C.G.A. § 51-3-1 and Georgia’s 2025 tort reform statute, SB 68 / O.C.G.A. § 51-3-51, property owners owe a duty of ordinary care to lawful visitors. When a landlord controls an apartment complex, that duty extends to the common areas: parking lots, breezeways, laundry rooms, stairwells, and building entrances.
The critical phrase in any negligent security case is foreseeable harm. A landlord is not automatically liable every time a crime occurs on their property. Liability attaches when the landlord knew or should have known that criminal activity posed a realistic risk and failed to take reasonable steps to reduce it. For incidents occurring after April 21, 2025, SB 68 created a distinct statutory standard requiring plaintiffs to meet heightened foreseeability thresholds, such as showing prior substantially similar crimes or particularized warnings, and proving the exploitation of a specific physical defect on the property.
What Evidence Establishes Foreseeability?
Prior, substantially similar criminal incidents on the property or particularized warnings are the primary evidence used to prove a landlord knew violent crime was a foreseeable risk under Georgia’s SB 68 standard.
Courts in Georgia look at whether the landlord had actual or constructive notice of prior crimes. Relevant evidence includes:
- Police reports documenting prior calls to the complex.
- Incident reports filed by tenants or property management
- News reports covering crimes at or adjacent to the property
- Complaints submitted in writing by residents
A prior substantially similar violent crime or direct notice can put a landlord on legal notice. Once that notice exists, the failure to respond with meaningful security measures becomes the foundation of a lawsuit.
What Security Measures Do Landlords Typically Owe Tenants?
Reasonable security at an apartment complex can include working locks, adequate lighting, functional gates, security cameras, and on-site personnel when the risk level warrants it.
There is no one-size-fits-all standard, but Georgia courts evaluate whether the landlord’s chosen measures were proportionate to the known risk. A complex with a documented history of shootings owes tenants a far higher level of protection than one in a low-crime area with no prior incidents. Note that under SB 68, showing location in a high-crime neighborhood alone is insufficient to establish a specific duty without prior substantially similar incidents on site or particularized notice.
Common failures seen in negligent security cases include:
- Broken gate systems are left unrepaired for weeks or months.
- Burned-out or missing lighting in parking areas and walkways
- Malfunctioning door locks on building entrances
- No security cameras despite prior violent incidents
- Failure to hire security personnel after repeated attacks
If a landlord’s failure to address any of these conditions created the opportunity for an attacker to reach and harm a tenant, the connection between the landlord’s negligence and the injury becomes a central issue in the case.
What Must an Injured Tenant Prove in Georgia?
To succeed on a Georgia negligent security claim, the tenant must prove the landlord owed a duty, breached it, and that the breach directly caused the injuries suffered.
More specifically, the injured person must show four things. First, the landlord owed a duty of care as the property owner or operator. Second, the landlord breached that duty by failing to provide reasonable security. Third, the criminal act was a foreseeable result of that failure. Third, under SB 68 for causes of action arising after April 21, 2025, the criminal act was foreseeable under tightened statutory standards and resulted from the exploitation of a physical condition on the property. Fourth, the breach caused actual harm.
Georgia follows a comparative fault framework under O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33, which means a landlord may argue the tenant was partially at fault. Even if that argument is raised, a victim who is found to be less than 50 percent responsible may still recover damages reduced by their assigned percentage of fault. Additionally, under SB 68, courts must apportion fault to the non-party criminal actors who committed the crime, which can reduce the landlord’s percentage of liability and monetary damages.
The Statute of Limitations in Georgia
Timing matters. Under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33, injured victims in Georgia generally have two years from the date of the injury to file a personal injury lawsuit. Missing that deadline almost always bars the claim entirely, regardless of how strong the evidence may be. Determining the date of injury is also vital because claims arising after April 21, 2025, are governed by Georgia’s SB 68 tort reform standards rather than pre-2025 case law.
Acting quickly also preserves critical evidence. Security camera footage is routinely overwritten within days. Witnesses move. Physical conditions at the property are repaired before documentation can proceed. Every week of delay can cost a case.
How Jarrett & Price, LLC Approaches Negligent Security Cases
When you work with Jarrett & Price, LLC, a managing attorney handles your case directly from start to finish. Every call, every update, and every legal decision is handled by an attorney, not a paralegal or case manager. Clients always know exactly who is working on their behalf and where the case stands.
If you or someone you love was shot, stabbed, or assaulted at an apartment complex in Duluth, Pooler, or anywhere else in Georgia, our team is ready to evaluate your claim. Contact us or call (855) 909-3021 to speak directly with an attorney about what happened and the options available to you.
Last updated: August 2026
